Monday, May 15, 2017

Case of the Week 446

This week's very timely case was donated by George at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The following objects were seen in a wet mount of a concentrated stool specimen. They measure less than 20 micrometers in dimension and do not have an apparent operculum.

Here is their appearance using iodine:


Identification?


20 comments:

  1. I am not sure, but with the potential medical history of cancer (cancer centre), the object not having an operculum and it's small size, I think it is an artefact like a yeast cell or fungal spore...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Given the association with cancer and its morphology could it be Enterobius vermicularis?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not sure... dicrocoelium dendriticum? perhaps this patients eated any ant ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Not a parasite. Probably a fungal spore or some sort of pollen grains

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe the size is much too small to be Dicrocoelium, and not flattened on one side as you would see in Enterobius. I have to concur with Kevin Barker, and say it's a yeast cell of some kind, not a parasite. This is a bit of a stumper!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mushroom spore. Great mimic of pinworm eggs.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The object is not compatible in morphology with those of parasites ova. Most likely a fungal spore, cannot associate with a yeast cell since there is no budding.
    Florida Fan

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not pinworm eggs. Makes me think eggs of another sp. Iodine stain prob key.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's hookworm egg

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wait, wait.....I think I've got it, Bobbi! "Timely" - "Sloan Kettering Cancer Center" - This is some part of a seed or leaf of cannabis that has been ingested! At least, that's my crazy wild guess. Could it be? (I hope posters aren't limited to only one response!)

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. However, just based on appearance alone how would you differentiate from metagonimus or heterophyes which can have hard to find operculi?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I would have to say artifact. It is too small for most other eggs and the ones that size mostly have an operculum.

    ReplyDelete
  14. it' s to small for dicrocoelium... and no operculum...
    perhaps spore mushroom, I'm in confusion.
    Can you write the answer, please!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. It looks like an artifact. Perhaps a mushroom spore. Too small for a mite egg though it reminds me ...

    ReplyDelete