Answer to the Parasite Case of the Week 775: Not a parasite. This is actually a hair from my house cat, Walter. Here he is keeping me company while I am trying to update a parasitology chapter:
As noted by Florida Fan, "The objects have neither external nor internal organs. We have a common saying: "No head, no tail, no guts, no parasites”
Most readers realized that this object was not a parasite, but a few did suggest that it was a tapeworm such as
Rodentolepis (formerly
Hymenolepis)
nana, given the superficial resemblance of the cuticle scale and fragmented, 'ladder like' medulla to craspedote (overlapping) proglottids. However, we can differentiate the hair from
R. nana proglottids by the smaller size, refractile nature, and lack of uterine structures. Check out the following comparison of our current case to an image of
R. nana from a
previous post donated by Dr. Emily Snaverly:
A few particularly savvy readers correctly guessed the nature of this object. There are a number of animal hairs that have this appearance, including some rodents (e.g., mice, chinchillas). You can see an amazing archive of mammalian hair images
HERE. From the standpoint of the diagnostic laboratory, the important thing is to recognize that the submitted object is not a parasite and report it as such.